0.03/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.03/0.13 % Command : eprover-ho %s --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers -auto-schedule -p --cpu-limit=%d --neg-ext=all --pos-ext=all --ext-sup-max-depth=2 --schedule-kind=CASC 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 1200 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 120 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 13:46:14 EDT 2021 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : 0.12/0.34 % Number of cores: 8 0.12/0.34 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.12/0.35 # Version: 2.6rc1-ho 0.12/0.35 # No SInE strategy applied 0.12/0.35 # Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds 0.20/0.46 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___008_C45_F1_PI_S5PRR_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4S 0.20/0.46 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHPNS. 0.20/0.46 # 0.20/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.043 s 0.20/0.46 0.20/0.46 # Proof found! 0.20/0.46 # SZS status Theorem 0.20/0.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.20/0.46 thf(setminusEL, conjecture, (dsetconstrEL=>![X1:$i, X5:$i, X3:$i]:(in @ X3 @ (setminus @ X1 @ X5)=>in @ X3 @ X1)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', setminusEL)). 0.20/0.46 thf(dsetconstrEL, axiom, (dsetconstrEL<=>![X1:$i, X2:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(in @ X3 @ (dsetconstr @ X1 @ (^[X4:$i]:X2 @ X4))=>in @ X3 @ X1)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', dsetconstrEL)). 0.20/0.46 thf(setminus, axiom, (setminus)=(^[X1:$i, X5:$i]:dsetconstr @ X1 @ (^[X3:$i]:~(in @ X3 @ X5))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', setminus)). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_3, plain, ![X4:$i, X2:$i > $o]:(epred2_2 @ X2 @ X4<=>X2 @ X4), introduced(definition)). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_4, plain, ![X12:$i, X5:$i]:(epred1_2 @ X5 @ X12<=>~in @ X12 @ X5), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[introduced(definition)])). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~((![X1:$i, X2:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(in @ X3 @ (dsetconstr @ X1 @ (epred2_2 @ X2))=>in @ X3 @ X1)=>![X1:$i, X5:$i, X3:$i]:(in @ X3 @ (setminus @ X1 @ X5)=>in @ X3 @ X1))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[setminusEL]), dsetconstrEL]), c_0_3])). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X1:$i, X5:$i]:(setminus @ X1 @ X5)=(dsetconstr @ X1 @ (epred1_2 @ X5)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[setminus]), c_0_4])). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X15:$i, X16:$i > $o, X17:$i]:((~in @ X17 @ (dsetconstr @ X15 @ (epred2_2 @ X16))|in @ X17 @ X15)&(in @ esk3_0 @ (setminus @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)&~in @ esk3_0 @ esk1_0)), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X13:$i, X14:$i]:(setminus @ X13 @ X14)=(dsetconstr @ X13 @ (epred1_2 @ X14)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i, X2:$i > $o]:(in @ X1 @ X3|~in @ X1 @ (dsetconstr @ X3 @ (epred2_2 @ X2))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X1:$i, X3:$i]:(setminus @ X1 @ X3)=(dsetconstr @ X1 @ (epred1_2 @ X3)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X1:$i, X2:$i > $o, X3:$i, X4:$i]:(in @ X1 @ X3|(epred1_2 @ X4)!=(epred2_2 @ X2)|~in @ X1 @ (setminus @ X3 @ X4)), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])])). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X2:$i > $o, X1:$i, X3:$i, X4:$i]:(in @ X1 @ X3|(epred1_2 @ X4 @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ X4))!=(epred2_2 @ X2 @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ X4))|~in @ X1 @ (setminus @ X3 @ X4)), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X23:$i, X24:$i > $o]:((~epred2_2 @ X24 @ X23|X24 @ X23)&(~X24 @ X23|epred2_2 @ X24 @ X23)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X2:$i > $o, X4:$i, X3:$i, X1:$i]:(epred2_2 @ X2 @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ X1)|epred1_2 @ X1 @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ X1)|in @ X3 @ X4|~in @ X3 @ (setminus @ X4 @ X1)), inference(dynamic cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, in @ esk3_0 @ (setminus @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ~in @ esk3_0 @ esk1_0, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_17, plain, ![X2:$i > $o, X1:$i]:(X2 @ X1|~epred2_2 @ X2 @ X1), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o]:(epred1_2 @ esk2_0 @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ esk2_0)|epred2_2 @ X2 @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ esk2_0)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15]), c_0_16])). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_19, plain, ![X21:$i, X22:$i]:((~epred1_2 @ X22 @ X21|~in @ X21 @ X22)&(in @ X21 @ X22|epred1_2 @ X22 @ X21)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_20, plain, ![X2:$i > $o]:(epred1_2 @ esk2_0 @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ esk2_0)|X2 @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ esk2_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18])). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_21, plain, ![X2:$i > $o, X1:$i, X3:$i, X4:$i]:(in @ X1 @ X3|~epred1_2 @ X4 @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ X4)|~epred2_2 @ X2 @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ X4)|~in @ X1 @ (setminus @ X3 @ X4)), inference(dynamic cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_22, plain, ![X3:$i, X1:$i]:(in @ X1 @ X3|epred1_2 @ X3 @ X1), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_23, plain, ![X2:$i > $o, X1:$i]:(epred2_2 @ X2 @ X1|~X2 @ X1), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_24, plain, epred1_2 @ esk2_0 @ (esk4_2 @ (epred1_2 @ esk2_0) @ esk2_0), inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_25, plain, ![X2:$i > $o, X4:$i, X3:$i, X1:$i]:(in @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ X1|in @ X3 @ X4|~epred2_2 @ X2 @ (esk4_2 @ X2 @ X1)|~in @ X3 @ (setminus @ X4 @ X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22])). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_26, plain, epred2_2 @ (epred1_2 @ esk2_0) @ (esk4_2 @ (epred1_2 @ esk2_0) @ esk2_0), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_24])). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_27, plain, ![X1:$i, X3:$i]:(in @ (esk4_2 @ (epred1_2 @ esk2_0) @ esk2_0) @ esk2_0|in @ X1 @ X3|~in @ X1 @ (setminus @ X3 @ esk2_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_26])). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_28, plain, ![X3:$i, X1:$i]:(~epred1_2 @ X1 @ X3|~in @ X3 @ X1), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, in @ (esk4_2 @ (epred1_2 @ esk2_0) @ esk2_0) @ esk2_0, inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_15]), c_0_16])). 0.20/0.46 thf(c_0_30, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28, c_0_29]), c_0_24])]), ['proof']). 0.20/0.46 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.20/0.46 # Proof object total steps : 31 0.20/0.46 # Proof object clause steps : 20 0.20/0.46 # Proof object formula steps : 11 0.20/0.46 # Proof object conjectures : 8 0.20/0.46 # Proof object clause conjectures : 5 0.20/0.46 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3 0.20/0.46 # Proof object initial clauses used : 8 0.20/0.46 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3 0.20/0.46 # Proof object generating inferences : 8 0.20/0.46 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 5 0.20/0.46 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative 0.20/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 7 0.20/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.20/0.46 # Initial clauses : 12 0.20/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 4 0.20/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8 0.20/0.46 # Processed clauses : 116 0.20/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 1 0.20/0.46 # ...subsumed : 15 0.20/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 100 0.20/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1 0.20/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.20/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.20/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 1 0.20/0.46 # Generated clauses : 331 0.20/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 134 0.20/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.20/0.46 # Paramodulations : 194 0.20/0.46 # Factorizations : 2 0.20/0.46 # NegExts : 1 0.20/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 1 0.20/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.20/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0 0.20/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.20/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.20/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.20/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.20/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.20/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.20/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.20/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.20/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.20/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.20/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 98 0.20/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 68 0.20/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.20/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 2 0.20/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 28 0.20/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 25 0.20/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 77 0.20/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.20/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 2 0.20/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 333 0.20/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 296 0.20/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 15 0.20/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.20/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.20/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1271 0.20/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 1 0.20/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.20/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0 0.20/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6843 0.20/0.46 0.20/0.46 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.20/0.46 # User time : 0.108 s 0.20/0.46 # System time : 0.005 s 0.20/0.46 # Total time : 0.113 s 0.20/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1636 pages 0.20/0.46 EOF